Judge dismisses officers' lawsuit over Jan 6 memorial plaque
US District Judge Dabney Friedrich ruled former officer Harry Dunn and Metro officer Daniel Hodges lacked standing to force changes to the memorial plaque honouring January 6 defenders.
Washington DC, Oct 2 — A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit by two police officers who sought to force changes to the memorial plaque honouring the law enforcement response to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack.
US District Judge Dabney Friedrich ruled on Wednesday (September 30) that former Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn and Metropolitan Police officer Daniel Hodges lacked standing to sue, finding they had not suffered a concrete injury a court could remedy, 710 WOR and Newsmax reported.
Congress mandated the plaque in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022, requiring the Architect of the Capitol to install within a year a plaque naming every officer who responded. The deadline passed, and the plaque installed in March 2026 lists only responding agencies and organisations, with a QR code linking to individual officers’ names, Newsmax reported.
Dunn and Hodges argued the plaque’s placement in the Senate wing, rather than its mandated spot on the Capitol’s western front, kept it out of public view, and that the failure to comply with the mandate violated the Constitution’s equal-protection clause.
Judge Friedrich rejected both injury theories. She held that the officers’ psychological distress over what they viewed as inadequate recognition was merely a “psychological consequence” of disagreement with government action, and that harassment by private third parties was too far removed from the Architect’s actions to establish legal causation. She cited Chief Justice John Roberts’ dissent in a separate case, noting that a strong interest alone does not create a concrete injury under Article III.
More on this topic: all Politics stories