Skip to content

All the news that matters, in plain English.

Latest
  1. Hurricane Polo re-strengthens to Category 5, forecast to make landfall in Baja California Sur on Monday
  2. India delivers right of reply to Shehbaz Sharif's UNGA speech — warns "terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences"
  3. Liverpool reappoint Julian Ward as sporting director after Hughes exits for Al-Hilal
  4. Magnitude 6.6 earthquake strikes Loyalty Islands, New Caledonia; no tsunami threat
  5. NYPD arrests two men seen emerging from New York City manhole near Upper East Side hotel
  6. Pro-Palestine Action group plans mass vigil at Labour conference in Liverpool
  7. Pentagon HR breach exposed unencrypted personal data of up to 4 million US military personnel
  8. SpaceX lines up Crew-13 and Falcon Heavy NROL-97 on a same-day Oct 1 doubleheader

World

Independent review finds security lapses before Charlie Kirk shooting at Utah Valley University

Utah Valley University has released an independent after-action report on the September 2025 shooting of Charlie Kirk, finding his Turning Point USA organisation insisted he speak outdoors despite security concerns while the university deferred critical safety decisions.

Utah Valley University has released an independent after-action report on the shooting that killed conservative activist Charlie Kirk on its Orem campus on 10 September 2025, finding a string of security failures — including that his Turning Point USA (TPUSA) organisation insisted he speak outdoors despite reservations from university officials.

According to the report, released on Friday, the university did not conduct a formal security assessment, did not create a written event action plan, and deferred critical decision-making to Turning Point USA. At an August 2025 planning meeting, a TPUSA representative insisted Kirk speak at a courtyard on campus because he had been there previously and the organisation was familiar with the location. Some university officials expressed reservations about holding the event in an outdoor space with tall buildings around, but ultimately allowed it to proceed. “In our assessment, those decisions were consequential,” the report said.

The outdoor location “created significant protective operations considerations,” the report found, but the planning process included no documented line-of-sight assessment, no pre-event briefing or walk-through with security stakeholders, and no clear coordination with the speaker’s private security team and external law enforcement partners. The possibility of a rooftop shooter was not properly assessed.

Candace Owens, who has been critical of the circumstances around the event, called the report “the most damning document we have seen since”, saying it confirmed her suspicions about the planning process.

Sources

More on this topic: all World stories

Get Flip News by email

This opens your email app — we add you manually. No account, no spam, no third parties.